...
Dark Mode Light Mode

Diddy Says Freak-Off Movies Reveal His “Innocence”: Feds Are Prudes

Diddy Says Freak-Off Movies Reveal His “Innocence”: Feds Are Prudes Diddy Says Freak-Off Movies Reveal His “Innocence”: Feds Are Prudes

[ad_1]

Diddy Says Freak-Off Movies Reveal His “Innocence”
Going by means of a trial later this yr for intercourse trafficking and totally different damning prices, the much-accused Sean “Diddy” Combs in the mean time took an unlimited swing at prosecutors’ insistence that his so-called freak-offs had been depraved and nonconsensual debaucheries.

In accordance with Combs’ formidable attorneys inside the latest variation on their assault of the accuser strategies, their shopper devoted no crimes in his future relationship with “Sufferer-1,” and the feds are prudes who want to administration what goes on in people’s bedrooms.

“Faraway from the federal authorities’s lurid descriptions, the flicks current adults having consensual intercourse, plain and straightforward,” exclaims a letter from the incarcerated Harmful Boy Knowledge founder’s safety group despatched Tuesday morning to Select Arun Subramanian. “At bottom, this case is about whether or not or not Sufferer-I was or was not a ready participant in her private intercourse life with Mr. Combs. The flicks affirm that she plainly was.”

“There is not a proof of any violence, coercion, threats, or manipulation in anyway,” the significantly redacted correspondence gives of the self-described “pretty darkish and grainy” intercourse tapes, as a result of it seeks to have a defending order modified relating to the flicks. “There is not a proof that anyone is incapacitated or beneath the have an effect on of drugs or excessive alcohol consumption. There’s really no proof of intercourse trafficking.”

Study the letter from Sean ‘Diddy” Combs & his safety group claiming that the freak-offs with Sufferer-1 had been all consenting proper right here

One in all many main witnesses and sources for the U.S. Lawyer’s office, “Sufferer-1” has prolonged been acknowledged as Combs’ former girlfriend Cassie Ventura. No matter an unlimited bucks payoff to licensed movement of Ventura’s private in November closing yr over the 2007-2018 relationship the duo had, the safety has tried repeatedly to characterize her as an brisk and ready participant in Combs’ escapades.

Arrested by the NYPD on September 16 in a Manhattan lodge lobby, Combs is charged with racketeering, intercourse trafficking and transportation to engage in prostitution. Already behind bars at Brooklyn’s harsh Metropolitan Detention Center, the place suspected United Healthcare CEO assassin Luigi Mangione is simply too, Combs has repeatedly been denied strikes to be granted a $50 million bail. Having taken dozens of whacks on the U.S. Lawyer’s case up to now, Combs is represented by a pricey licensed group led by Marc Agnifilo and Teny Geragos.

Combating dozens of various sexual assault circumstances in federal and state courtroom along with one with Jay-Z as a co-defendant, Combs’ jail trial is about to start out out May 5. If found accountable, the 55-year-old Grammy winner is life in jail.

In some methods the place Combs finds himself in the mean time was kicked off when chart-topping singer Ventura sued Combs in a civil case in late 2023 for sexual assault and abuse.

On the time, Combs vehemently denied all of Ventura’s claims, along with these of drugging her and forcing her to engage in what later turned termed the freak-offs. However, to that, the rapper moreover settled with Ventura inside a day for an estimated $30 million.

Months later, a 2016 security video went public of a half-naked Combs violently beating an escaping Ventura inside the corridor of an upscale L.A. lodge. Already stopping off a group of various lawsuits, Combs quickly took to social media to apologize for the assault. Ventura’s group nearly immediately labeled Combs’ phrases as “disingenuous” and that the apology “is additional about himself than the numerous people he has harm.” Authorized professionals for the rapper on this jail case have subsequently tried to reframe the video, which Combs paid handsomely for on the time, as a targeted leak and smear by the feds and by no means really an assault on Ventura.

Proper this second’s letter is one different strive by the media savvy safety to as quickly as as soon as extra try to flip the script on the case, every inside the courtroom and the courtroom of public opinion. In no small half, this latest switch principally asserts that Combs did not energy “Sufferer-1” to have kinky intercourse with him and others in the direction of her will, nonetheless that the prudish authorities must “police non-conforming sexual train” – and the 9 motion pictures at scenario proper right here present it.

“Any fair-minded viewer of the flicks will quickly conclude that the prosecution of Mr. Combs is every sexist and puritanical,” Agnifilo and Geragos bluntly declare inside the seven-page letter.

“It is sexist because of the federal authorities’s idea perpetuates stereotypes of female victimhood and lack of firm,” they’re saying. “The prosecution shows a paternalistic view that the federal authorities is correct right here to protect girls, who cannot be trusted to make their very personal picks about intercourse, and are not capable of consenting to intercourse that the prosecutors view as outdoor the ‘norm’”.

“These motion pictures depict clearly consensual intercourse amongst ready adults in a decades-long relationship and principally undermine the federal authorities’s case and Sufferer-1 ‘s claims.”

Contacted by Deadline, the U.S. Lawyer’s office for the Southern District of New York declined to the touch upon the letter from Combs and his safety to Select Subramanian. Ventura’s lawyer Douglas Wigdor did not reply to request for contact upon the correspondence. If Wigdor or his office do reply this submit will seemingly be updated.

Proper this second’s letter comes as Combs was sued earlier this week by a Jane Doe who claims the one-time music mogul drugged and raped her after a NYC baby-sitting job in 2000 after offering her a journey home. Alleging two male employees of Combs sat by as a result of the assault occurred at a separate location she was pushed to, the plaintiff says she was 16 on the time.  After being “raped by Combs,” the submitting says the plaintiff “was lastly taken home and left inside the lobby of her establishing by the similar driver.”

Among the many many 40 or so folks, female and male, that say Combs rape, abused and assaulted them, there are a variety of minors – along with a 10-year-old boy.

Late January 13, Combs’ group responded to the most recent submitting of this now middle-aged Jane Doe.

“Regardless of what variety of lawsuits are filed, it obtained’t change the reality that Mr. Combs has certainly not sexually assaulted or intercourse trafficked anyone—man or girl, grownup or minor,” talked about a spokesperson for the performer. “We dwell in a world the place anyone can file a lawsuit for any trigger. Fortuitously, a very good and impartial judicial course of exists to go looking out the fact, and Mr. Combs is assured he’ll prevail in courtroom.”

In a single different Combs case, Jay-Z obtained permission slightly below two weeks up to now from a federal select to pursue a model new motion to dismiss the case accusing the ‘Ineffective Presidents’ rapper, Combs and a nonetheless unknown female “Famous person B” of raping a 13-year-old lady over 24 years up to now, and the defendant born Shawn Carter has wasted no time attending to it.

As properly making an attempt as soon as extra to get the high-profile matter tossed out, Jay-Z wants the Jane Doe plaintiff’s lawyer to pay, really and figuratively.

Jay-Z and Sean Combs attend the latter’sJuly 4th Celebration on July 2, 2000 in East Hampton, NY. ({Photograph} by Patrick McMullan by means of Getty Pictures)

“Whereas the allegations acknowledged inside the criticism on this case are gravely extreme (and injurious to Mr. Carter’s hard-won fame), numerous them, on their face, stress the outer bounds of credulity, and none of them appears to have been subjected to even primarily probably the most rudimentary diligence by the submitting lawyer who initially signed his title to them and has since declined to withdraw them,” declares the memorandum of laws accompanying the motion filed on January 8 in New York Metropolis by Jay-Z’s longtime lawyer Alex Spiro of Tony Buzbee.

After which the kicker comes: “Because of the Federal Pointers {{and professional}} ethics require additional of a submitting lawyer, Mr. Carter now respectfully seeks acceptable sanctions.”

Till you had been missing how exhausting profitable on the Houston-based Buzbee’s pockets, billionaire hip hop artist and the very costly Quinn Emanuel affiliate had been pondering …properly, let Jay-Z and Spiro educate you.

“A monetary sanction would assure some measure of deterrence of this sort of conduct ultimately,” they supply to Select Analisa Torres. “That sanction may take the kind of reimbursing Mr. Carter for his attorneys’ fees and costs incurred in defending in the direction of this movement.”

A.Okay.A. a complete bunch of tons of of {{dollars}}, if not 1,000,000 or additional.

Buzbee had his accounting of varieties in response.

“Mr. Spiro and his company are paid by the hour,” the Lone Star state lawyer knowledgeable Deadline in an announcement closing week. “So, they file numerous junk with the Court docket docket,” he continued with a clear nod to Select Torres’ December 26 rebuke of Spirio’s “relentless submitting of combative motions containing inflammatory language and advert hominem assaults …a tactic unlikely to revenue his shopper,”

Buzbee added: “With each frantic submitting, his group reeks of desperation. He and his group assume the authorized pointers and pointers don’t apply to them. They’re flat mistaken. As well as they assume they may bully or intimidate counsel for victims by submitting meritless and frivolous pleadings filled with lies and half-truths. As soon as extra, they’re lifeless mistaken. We obtained’t be bullied or intimidated, ever. We’ll deal with the utter lack of benefit collectively together with his submitting with the Court docket docket, fairly than with the press.”

Truly, like Combs’ intercourse trafficking case safety group, both sides have tried to play this case out inside the courtroom of media opinion, making an attempt to tug strings to frame their very personal variations of events.

Nonetheless, having come up the losers late closing month in getting the initially October 20 filed go effectively with and the first amended criticism of December 20 strong off, the innocence insisting Jay-Z and lawyer Spiro have tripled down on inconsistencies. Notably, inconsistencies out of what the now middled aged plaintiff talked about in her paperwork and what she knowledgeable NBC Data of “some errors” in a filmed mid-December sit-down.

Similar to the ravenous customer at a buffet, the safety has wolfed up the reality that Buzbee appeared to backtrack a step or two on his shopper after that NBC Data interview. Buzbee talked about the case was “referred to our company by one different, who vetted it earlier to sending it to us.” He backed up his shopper on the similar time, exclaiming that Jane Doe “stays fiercely adamant that what she has acknowledged is true, to top-of-the-line of her memory.”

The recollection is that the then teen Jane Doer was repeatedly rape at thought of one among Diddy’s allegedly fueled freak offs merely after the 2000 MTV VMAs on September 7 of that yr. At first Buzbee’s submitting, thought of one among dozens he has in made in fairly a number of circumstances in the direction of Combs, named solely the All Regarding the Benjamins singer for the rape, with a male “Famous person A” and a female “Famous person B” as the other assaulting people. Jay-Z was named as a result of the “Famous person A” inside the DAC closing month on the heels of a separate go effectively with from a Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan-represented anonymous “film star and public decide who resides in Los Angeles” went after the Texas lawyer for extortion.

These allegations are so heinous in nature that I implore you to file a jail criticism, not a civil one!!” Jay-Z talked about in a handwritten assertion after December 20 submitting. As both sides accused the other of making an attempt to bribe consumers, and arm twist witnesses, Buzbee sued spate our on social media that Jay-Z was a posturing “bully” and Jay-Z mocked the lawyer and the lawsuit as a “sham.”

On January 8, Alex Baldwin and Elon Musk lawyer Spiro took wordsmith Jay-Z’s characterization of Jane Doe’s go effectively with and threw some legalese on it – with a sugary spoonful or two of leaps of faith:

“By any aim measure, the reality that virtually every step in Plaintiff’s narrative—from her

arrival on the VMAs to her interactions with the limousine driver and celebrities to the journey with

her father—appears to be false or extraordinarily unlikely casts considerable doubt on Plaintiff’s

allegation that Mr. Carter raped her, which he did not.,” Spiro’s memo states. “Confronted with these evident crimson flags, a dependable and ethical lawyer would have not solely omitted the quite a few misguided allegations from the criticism however as well as completed an intensive and cautious vetting of the core assault allegation sooner than affixing his or her signature to the criticism,” he continues about Buzbee.

“Abiding by that ethical duty was significantly important proper right here given the defamatory character of the assault allegation and the near certainty that the criticism would generate enormous publicity in delicate of the id of the defendant, inflicting irreparable reputational harm and forcing him to make clear to his private youngsters that he had been falsely accused of assaulting a child.”

In that vein, Jay-Z and Spiro are requesting a listening to ASAP sooner than Select  Analisa Torres to argue their motion. No date has been set by the courtroom up to now.

[ad_2]

Add a comment Add a comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Submit Comment

Previous Post
Invoice Burr on Hulu Particular, LA Fires, Comedy Censorship, Hostile Crowds

Invoice Burr on Hulu Particular, LA Fires, Comedy Censorship, Hostile Crowds

Next Post
Ethiopia’s Grim Practice: Mass Dog Killings in Addis Ababa Spark Outcry

Ethiopia’s Grim Practice: Mass Dog Killings in Addis Ababa Spark Outcry

Cookie Consent Banner by Real Cookie Banner